Fantasy Buddy Reads discussion

This topic is about
Shadows of Self
Archive [Retired Buddy Reads]
>
Shadows of Self
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Hacen
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 26, 2017 12:23AM

reply
|
flag




i really didn't give any thought to that!

(view spoiler)
I also like this book more than the first. Still not as much as the original trilogy but all the same a lot better than the first.

Steris was back to her usual stern self in the beginning of this book, which was a little bit of disappointment for me i have to admit, but she's back on track now. I'm starting to lik..."
(view spoiler)


(view spoiler)
I found it a lot better than the first book. 4 stars from me. It was a very good read and the ending... wow!!!
I still like the original Mistborn trilogy better, but this one as a whole turned out to be not bad at all either! I'll talk more about it when you are all done.

I wonder if you'll find this trilogy better than the original or not. The opinions on this seem to be split over here.

[spoilers removed]
I found it a lot better than the first book. 4 stars from me. It was a very good read and the ending... wow!!!
I still like the original Mistborn trilogy better, bu..."
Im 100% with you. It was an improvement over the last book but still not as good as the first era.
(view spoiler)

[spoilers removed]
I found it a lot better than the first book. 4 stars from me. It was a very good read and the ending... wow!!!
I still like the original Mistborn tril..."
My thoughts exactly!




Only about a quarter way through, but I'm really enjoying it. I think Sanderson made a really good call by making this series less dense and more focused on a single, smaller plot. It's a weird situation because I feel that he can do this only after writing a longer series to really set up the world, and now he can reap the rewards by just having fun, semi-standalone stories which can take advantage of the world and mechanics already established.
As it is now, I'm enjoying this second batch of Mistborn books more than the first trilogy, but only because they can take advantage of what was established in the first trilogy. If that makes sense :p To put it another way; I'm much happier that Sanderson went for something almost 'pulpy' rather than right another longer, 'epic' series.