Editor's note: Two for the price of one! Apologies for not posting a question last week. I somehow completely forgot.
There is a general rule of mystery writing that says the reader should be able to solve the mystery. Christie violates that rule here, making it nearly impossible for us to solve the mystery. How did that make you feel? Did it bother you? Or did you not even notice it in the drive of the story?
Did you have any thoughts as to who the murder was? What clues did you see that made you suspect that particular person? Were you right?
How did everyone like And Then There Were None? I love this book; even though I know how it ends, I always read it hoping for a change.
There is a general rule of mystery writing that says the reader should be able to solve the mystery. Christie violates that rule here, making it nearly impossible for us to solve the mystery. How did that make you feel? Did it bother you? Or did you not even notice it in the drive of the story?
Did you have any thoughts as to who the murder was? What clues did you see that made you suspect that particular person? Were you right?
How did everyone like And Then There Were None? I love this book; even though I know how it ends, I always read it hoping for a change.