LitRPG Forum discussion
The LitRPG elements spectrum & making LitRPG elements meaningful.
date
newest »




At least, that's how I feel about the genre. I canNOT afford to make anymore categories for books for me. LOL

Since litRPG and Gamelit brush the scifi barriers there are multiple ways of describing everything. I would definitely think of something like The Land or Ascend Online as harder on the gaming than, say, Crystal Shard. That doesn't make them not gamelit.

Thanks for the rundown I did not know that LITRPG’s fell under the umbrella of GameLit I only found out this term when seeing if the Scott pilgrim series counted as a LitRPG thanks for the distinction.
So I guess something like Gun Meister Online: Adult and Uncensored would be a LitFPS, I wonder then where shows like sword art online or Code lyoko would fall under. But yeah I think two genres works as well.

Ok your right it’s more about depth than how much it’s relays on it but then does something like the Scott pilgrim series count as GameLit because the world has a few video game quirks here and thier but by no mean is it fleshed out or even explained.

The lines are drawn where you put them. I'm sure that someone here could definitely write their own lines and say X is gamelit and Y is LitRPG. As stated Shamil in the beginning, they had 3 categories. That's not to say that those 3 are wrong. That's what works for em. I know that me personally, I have sub categories for Gamelit. I have LitFPS, HaremLit, LitRPG for example. And even for LitRPG, I have 2 more subcategories. VR and Non-VR. I wasn't trying to dissuade Shamil from making lines in the sand. Just trying to educate and from what I read, I was successful in illuminating that LitRPG's fall under GameLit. And like you stated, GameLit falls under Fantasy/Sci-Fi depending on how its written.





Granted, I do agree with you though on books that don't use rpg elements being listed under the genre. A bit like scifi books that have like ONE minor sci theme in them, which is irrelevant to the story. I've read some litrpg that, were I to skip the first chapter, I would be entirely unaware that they aren't just a regular fantasy novel. it does irk, as I pick up a litrpg title because i'm in the mood for some rpg fun.
Still, I think the majority of readers are probably here for general gamelit more than pure rpg elements. thus they don't care how "rpg" a book is, as long as there's a game world.

Taken to extremes, that's pretty much Restart. So, other than the fact that the book is a work of fiction, yeah, that would qualify as litrpg (if you made it fiction).
Books mentioned in this topic
Re-start (other topics)Gun Meister Online: Adult and Uncensored (other topics)
Level Up or Die! (other topics)
NPCs (other topics)
1-Hard LitRPGS = These are books where the world to a degree or completely is like a video game or where the plot or at least a important part of the story is being in a videogame/videogame like world. With this group the LitRPG elements are essential and removing them would fundamentally change them.
2-Soft LitRPGS = These are stories where the LitRPG elements are small or trivial. With books in this category you can remove the LitRPG elements with small effect on the book or little effect expect losing a cool video gamey aspect of the book.
3-Minimal LitRPGS = lastly these are books where the LitRGP elements are at best sparse or at worst an after thought. With these books the LitRPG elements can basically be removed and having no effect on the actual story or universe or quality of the book, basically the elements are irrelevant.
The reason I started this post was because their have been some books I’ve read that don’t meaningfully use the LitRPG Elements that they introduced, I’m not saying every book needs to have their LitRPG Elements be super flashed out and integral but they should at least be worth putting in the first place. This is not something that makes or breaks a book for me but would like to know if anybody else has run into this or just anybody's thought on this topic.