The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
The Sword Of Cullen
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Author Promo (Share Your Stuff!)
>
High vs. Low Fantasy

1. Your link isn’t specific to the post you’re referencing.
2. Your post has numerous typos, which is amusing once you mention all the typos in your story. (Hopefully you’ve hired a proofreader for your prose or, at the very least, run it through spellcheck.)
3. You’re using the terms “Low Fantasy” and “High Fantasy” incorrectly.
4. Your history of Fantasy as a genre is inaccurate.
5. If people are repeatedly telling you that you’re imitating Howard, maybe instead of dismissing them you should actually read Howard to see why they are saying that.


1. Your link isn’t specific to the post you’re referencing... "
Thanks for being That Guy, Trike. If not for this warning, I might have been misled by the link and expected a more legit discussion.
Dennis, this post seems like a thinly veiled attempt to promote your book, and I have to say, tricking people onto your blog so you can sell your stuff is not a good tactic - I'd suggest posting this kind of thing under the author promo section, as people are more likely to respond favourably if they don't feel they've been had.
I'm happy to talk high and low fantasy here, but try to keep the promotion out of it. I mean, I get the temptation, I do, but I think genuine conversation will serve you better in the long run.

Yeah, this. This feels like a thinly veiled attempt to garner clicks for your blog. I won't be surprised if this gets removed.

Got to go with Ruth on this. Not even a blog, just a sales hype (or hope perhaps). I am not going to click on a woman in a bikini with a rubbish sign.


I mean, just because an idea has been done before doesn't inherently mean it's a bad idea. But I have zero interest in reading this book.

"Joel is a liar and a fraud. If there are so many typos and you and your little friend really read the book, then give me examples. Of course, you won't, because you are a hateful little troll who has read nothing of mine. You're disgusting and yiu give social media a bad reputation."

I mean, just because an idea has been done before doesn'..."
No, i mean he seems to think it has not been done before. "a concept that is revolutionary" is his words, not mine.

I mean, just because an idea has been don..."
Ohh, OK I agree with you then. Very few concepts are "revolutionary" any more, just because of the massive amount of fiction already written.



/movie announcer voice
"Not since Edgar Rice Burroughs ...!"

If you have read only "a page of one [sic] Howard’s books years ago and gave it up", how can you know that "if you love Conan or Lord of the Rings you'll really enjoy this"? Just curious.
My initial thought is, that it's self promotion of the author's book. Though it's vagueness stops me from automatically placing it in the self promo section.
It isn't obvious which blog post we are supposed to be be discussing. I'm not clicking through every post.
I'll discuss any concept and idea, but I need the relevant information in the OP and a direct link, "if" I decide I need to read the whole article.
It isn't obvious which blog post we are supposed to be be discussing. I'm not clicking through every post.
I'll discuss any concept and idea, but I need the relevant information in the OP and a direct link, "if" I decide I need to read the whole article.


madness and amusement for readers not involved with the mess. I swear, authors behaving badly because of a bad review is one of my guilty pleasures. Seriously though, don't do it. Don't read them, and if you read them don't respond to them.







Wow.
There’s a saying that applies here: “If one person calls you an ass, ignore them. If two people call you an ass, check behind you for hoof prints. If three people call you an ass, get fitted for a saddle.”
Meaning: if everyone is having the same reaction, maybe there’s something to it. Look at these reactions. Maybe the problem isn’t in our receivers.
What’s with the liberal thing? I know for a fact that two of the people who responded to you in this thread aren’t liberals. They’re not even all Americans, so our political standards don’t apply. The only sensitive snowflake here is you.
Dennis wrote: "What have any of you done worthwhile except criticize others? Nothing. Probably never wrote one sentence."
Two minutes of research would show you that a couple of the folks responding to you are published authors. My real name is readily available to anyone not too lazy to search for it, and you would discover that I am an award-winning filmmaker and photographer.
So yeah, we know what it’s like to put stuff out there. We know what it’s like to suffer the slings and arrows of criticisms. We also know how to act like adults.

If you want to talk genre, there are extant threads for that. I’d advise you to read them. My PhD thesis was to be on genre, so you will find dozens of posts from me alone discussing this topic, one that I have devoted a significant portion of my adult life pondering and researching.
But first you need to put away the attitude. Attacking everyone you disagree with isn’t going to get you anywhere.

Lock the thread, maybe, but banning doesn’t help. People don’t learn and grow if we do that every time. If it devolves further from here, then sure, but everyone deserves a second chance. Even MAGAheads.


As my Baptist friends say, “Give it back to the Devil.”
Based on your reaction to this thread, though, sight unseen I wouldn’t be surprised if he merely said, “Meh, not my cuppa,” and you immediately went to guns.



+5 to you for being nice but this guy doesn't want to have a discussion about genre. He wants to troll. He's not here to contribute to our community. So I'm out.

If, on the other hand, you were just trying to get a rise out of people... Well, I hope it was worth it.





As I suspected. You could have answered my questions and had that conversation you claim to want, but you are only interested in trying to provoke anger. Shame.


I mean, look I'm all for a discussion on what constituents high fantasy and where the line is, especially as fairy tale retellings are my cup of tea and they tend to tread that line quite finely. But this is not that thread, and I don't think it was ever intended to be that thread. It started as pure author self-promotion and turned into an epic flame-out. Fun to watch, but extremely counter productive.



Dennis make a new thread to discuss any ideas related to genre fiction if you are genuine.
This has derailed and it is hard to see what the original point of the post was.
We will discuss anything here and do disagree with each other. But this is confusing.
This has derailed and it is hard to see what the original point of the post was.
We will discuss anything here and do disagree with each other. But this is confusing.
Dennis wrote: "Dara, let's delete you since you can't tolerate opinions that you don't share. Yeah, I am a MAGA head, which means I'm not a socialist whacko and that I support free speech."
I'm not deleting anyone, or shutting down this thread (yet) but can we stick to discussing the topic (if there is one)
Everyone here has different political views which can be respected. Our differences doesn't stop us debating and discussing ideas in a respectful and friendly way.
I am one of those socialist whackos. Go Bernie and AOC ;-) and an atheist to boot, which is fairly common in my State. I also support free speech, but not without limits.
I'm not deleting anyone, or shutting down this thread (yet) but can we stick to discussing the topic (if there is one)
Everyone here has different political views which can be respected. Our differences doesn't stop us debating and discussing ideas in a respectful and friendly way.
I am one of those socialist whackos. Go Bernie and AOC ;-) and an atheist to boot, which is fairly common in my State. I also support free speech, but not without limits.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
https://www.deathsteel.com/blog