Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion
Buddy Reads
>
De Profundis - Buddy Read
message 1:
by
Cynda
(new)
Aug 07, 2019 08:57PM

reply
|
flag


Two Milenas, nice and confusing: you chose the right words :-P


I will read as best I can from the digitized handwritten original . (I forget how to read handwriting. Who would've thought. . . .)
I will book read from basic Modern Library edition.



I cracked the book open only to make myself close it. I am getting excited to read. Curious: Is everyone getting close to settling on an edition?

I'm very excited about reading this too. That handwritten version is so cool!

I am in , got the copy on iBooks. I will start right away to make up for lost time on 2 weeks long vacation.
Happy Reading 😃




I am starting with some pre-reading, some background. When I googled "De Profundis," a new understanding loaded up on Wikipedia:
1. Sometimes Psalm 130--which you can see here-- is called the De Profundis Prayer.
2. Other writers have written De Profundis pieces. I looked at poetry of Lord Alfred Tennyson and poetry of Cristina Rosetti . While there is a longer list, including a hispanic writer on the list of those who have written a de profundis piece, I stuck with writers of the Aethestic Movement. Thought this info might help to make this De Profundis we are reading together connected to something else.

1. [In the Preface] Richard Ellmann suggests that De Profundis is a love letter, above all else. Does De Profundis follow the conventional form of a love letter? In what specific ways does De Profundis read like a love letter? In what ways does it differ? What makes it romantic?
2. Examine the letter's structure and define its different parts. Do Wilde's style and tone remain consistent throughout?
3. In De Profundis, Wilde recognizes numerous ironies regarding the circumstances of his imprisonment, most notably that he himself is imprisoned after suing Queensbury for slander. What other ironies (or paradoxes) does Wilde point out? What role does irony play in the letter? Why might Wilde choose to speak in these terms?
4. Do you think Wilde is a reliable narrator? How might his memories of Boise be influenced by his imprisonment? Do you find his criticism of Boise fair? Why or why not?
5. Throughout De Profundis, Wilde compares Alfred Douglas to numerous literary figures, from the lion's whelp in Agammenon to Hamlet's Rosencrantz and Guilderstern. What, if anything, do these figures have in common? How are they different? Compare the different contexts in which Wilde alludes to these figures?
6. What sort of freedom awaits Wilde upon his release? How does he aim to live?
7. Dante' Inferno is one of the texts to which Wilde frequently alludes to in De Profundis. Examine the different contexts in which he quotes from Inferno. What similarities, if any, can you find? Why do you think Wilde quotes from Dante so often?
8. Discuss Wilde's invocation of Christ as both a literary and historical figure. What quality of Christ does Wilde most admire? Why does Wilde call Christ the first individual in history? In what ways is Christ like an artist, according to Wilde? Richard Ellmann refers to this section as the letter's climax. Would you agree? Why ir why not?
9. After providing a withering critique of Alfred Douglas' behavior, Wilde turns his criticism on himself, claiming, "I must say to myself that neither you nor your father, multiplied a thousand times over, coukd have ruined a man like me: I ruined myself: and that nobody, great or small, can be ruined except by his own hand." Examine the reasons he gives for writing this. Do you agree with his claim?
10. Toward the end of the letter, Wilde writes, "A man whose desire is to be something separate from himself, to be a Member of Parliament, or a successful grocer, or a prominent solitictor, or a judge, or something equally tedious, invariably succeeds in being what he wants to be. That is his punishment. Those who want a mask have to wear it. What is the price Wilde has paid for this knowledge? Is this something he could have understood in his youth? Why or why not?

I am seeing Wilde taking an inventory of the relationship, not just his part or Lord Alfred's part, but something in between. That is what I am seeing early on. I continue ro read.



I found that Wilde regrets many things and may regret most his estrangement from his son, his great love. The biopic Wilde (1997) depicted Wilde making up stories, such as The Happy Prince for his sons.



From the questions Cynda posted above, one I'm really interested in hearing people's thoughts on is number 4:
Do you think Wilde is a reliable narrator?
When I was reading his scathing take on how everything that happened to him was caused by Bosie--Bosie's lack of character, or as Wilde puts it, his lack of imagination--I found it completely believable and infuriating. What was harder to believe was that Wilde said his "own grief and bitterness was forgotten." It's not that I don't believe he could have that purged from him--the combination of suffering and belief in forgiveness could surely accomplish that. But there seemed to be something still there. I wasn't sure what was there though, and it niggled at me throughout my reading. When I read at the end, Wilde's plans of meeting Bosie again, I was shocked. But then I thought maybe he did work through all of this and get back to … well, to love. What do you all think?

Self-reflection always poses challenges. As far as inventories I have written/read, this is the best one, the most thorough and honest. Anytime I momentarily wondered at the truth of what Wilde wrote, I always came away giving him the benefit of the doubt. The reason why? We have always have limited perceptions, understandings, awarenesses, abilities. So Yes I do think that there is inherently an imperfection in this inventory, that he has a hint of unreliability inherent in his humanity. Yet sometimes a detail is not important to the overall benefit of the inventory. Wilde has put much thought into the inventory and done both honest and literary-quality work. Well Done.
I think for me the question morphs: Could have Wilde done any better? I am pondering on this.

Because of that article (and others I've read that back that up), I say no, he's not a reliable narrator because none of us are.
I agree that there is still something there in terms of grief Kathleen. This story had made me think once again about what forgiveness really is. I think of myself as forgiving because I don't keep hatred in my heart and I always try to see the other person's perspective. I don't wish anyone harm either, but I can't say that I don't hold on to some bitterness and distrust.
It's like that saying that you can forgive but not forget. You can no longer have the same degree of trust you once had in a person, even if you reconcile and love them again. I don't think he meant "forgotten" literally, but more that he has put greif and bitterness behind him, as opposed to letting it simmer in the present.

As I said, by the end, I was convinced that his transcendent experience was real. I think we see attitudes that sometimes seem miraculous to us in people who go through great sorrows.
To your question, Cynda, "Could Wilde have done any better?" On reflection, I don't see how. This is really a beautiful work of art and delivers a profound philosophy. So, so glad I read it. Thanks all!!



No that wasn't it, but that one was very interesting. It's a similar concept but a little different focus with it being more on self reflection. The article you post is more philosophical (and I agree with the philosophy).
I can't find the one I read but have read many others that were similar. They were all based on how new events change our perception of old ones and also how memories can be planted by suggestion. It was based on scientific study. This one seems to hit on many of the same points https://science.howstuffworks.com/lif...


I'm afraid I was very disappointed with it. I was expecting something beautiful, and while there were some beautiful passages and insights, I was taken aback by his seemingly endless criticisms of Alfred Douglas, laying the blame for everything squarely upon him.
I understand prison life must have been horrible to him, and Douglas may well have been a narcissist, but the whining about Bosie keeping him, a genius artist, from his work and the pettiness of recording f.e. to the pound exactly how much he had spent on Bosie, who was not suitably grateful, really turned me off.
Oscar was older, he should have been wiser. But when I read that after his release he went to live in Naples with Bosie, I thought he had learned nothing.
In hindsight, I wish I had just read the abridged version in The Annotated Oscar Wilde instead. That had more extensive notes, but cut out a lot of the ranting.

I'm afraid I was very disappoint..."
I unknowingly read the originally published abridged version first and that's why I give it 5 stars. I went back and found the other full version once I found out there was one. I agree. I didn't like the endless criticisms of Alfred Douglas, even though they were warranted. It felt like none of my business. I think it would have been better not to publish the full version.
Books mentioned in this topic
De Profundis (other topics)De Profundis (other topics)
The Annotated Oscar Wilde (other topics)
The Happy Prince (other topics)
Sense and Sensibility (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jane Austen (other topics)Oscar Wilde (other topics)