Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Horror
>
FED UP WITH ZOMBIES YET?
date
newest »


Yes! we are headed for even more of this for at least the next couple of years.

Second, yeah, I'm with you on that. The whole zombie thing needs to die.
Real horror is what a story makes us confront within ourselves.


Zombies now are at their best being used like seasoning, or even like an appetizer (yummy brains). Just a little bit, to bring out the overall flavor instead of letting them overrun the metaphorical paramedics.

World War Z was a big disappointment for me--even given that Brad Pitt stared. We still had chasing down the serum again. Heck, The Omega man pulled that one off years ago. So what do they do, they give us I am legend as a remake. But at least the Zombies were fast, thinking and cunning--somewhat of a pseudo personality--or a harboring revenge instinct.
Have we ever had talking, intelligent zombies?

TWD actually got boring for me around issue 90. I gave up on the show almost immediately.
I never bothered with WWZ, though I will read it eventually. I love the idea of an oral history of the whole ordeal. I Am Legend, the book, is amazing and I'm disapoointed that there hasn't been a good adaptation since The Last Man On Earth.
I'd have to go through some more comics and books to think of some other good uses (they exist). As for movies or tv, it just doesn't happen a whole lot anymore.



I can be reading a book description and liking it so far, but one mention of Zombie and I'm not at all interested.
I also read very little horror. To me, based on my own experiences, real life is scary enough. I don't need to read fictional accounts to terrify me. To me that is not at all entertaining. Lots of people love it. I'm glad it's out there for them. It's just not for me.

TWD can drag on at times, but I'm not sure if I agree the zombies are like background radiation or seasoning. I think I would get really bored if all there was to zombie movies/shows are the zombies mulling around eating people. You need some human characters to care about, or what the heck would be the point?
Just my 2 cents.


Original *horror*? Although it's really modern gothic . . . try "The Well," or "The Hauntings of Hood Canal," by Jack Cady.
I never thought I would say that anything did this, but for me, "The Well" surpassed "The Fall of the House of Usher."

Original *horror*? A..."
The late Jack Cady will be remembered for his unique writing and story telling ability long after many of his peers are forgotten.

His work has been buried under the morass of the merely adequate for too long. I fell in love with it, unknowing, when I was a teenager. I stumbled across the short story, "The Burning" somewhere and it haunted me. I couldn't remember the author's name. And then "The Night We Buried Road Dog," in Science Fiction and Fantasy. I didn't put the two together until all these years later as I've collected his works and read, and re-read, and re-re-read and continue to do so. I think perhaps his novel, Singleton, is my favorite of the novels, and Singleton was the narrative character in "The Burning."
I wish I could have known him, but reading his words and their keen insights has definitely made me a far better writer than I ever could have been without him.




My latest novel has zombies in it, but they're part of a greater post-apoc. It's not The Zombie Apocalypse, it's more Apocalypse Of Everything That Could Kill You... including zombies. I try not to add to the saturation of the market, but zombies are so versatile and they're such an ingrained part of American mythology it's hard to get away from them.


I can be reading a book description and liking it so far, but one mention of Zombie and I'm not a..."
I'm one that ascribes to a loose definition of "zombie." I'd call Contagion a zombie movie, or the first half of one, at least. One I hope to read one day is Cordyceps. As near as I can tell, the infected don't attack the uninfected, but they do start crawling into vents to spread the infection, so I don't know what happens after that.

There's A wicked witch... not of the West, though. Think further back, and more Grimm.


I agree that every writer should find their own voice and tell the stories that only THEY can tell.... BUT plenty of readers like the familiar and the comfortable. I've been reading Stephen King for most of my life, and opening one of his books is like pulling on a pair of comfy old socks.
I am not suggesting that everyone copy each other's ideas in order to make more money, but I'm just saying that one should not be embarrassed by repetition or scrap a story just because it's been done before. Harry Potter had been done before, and the series still revolutionized the YA market. There are no absolutes in this business--except that there are no absolutes.
Zombies ARE overdone, though. Sexy vampires, too. Most of the readers I know have moved on to other things.

Familiar and comfortable is fine if familiar and comfortable are not boring. The problem is most authors who write about tired ideas do not bring anything original to the table or give those tired ideas new twists that would re-invent them. That's what King did. Also what Rowling did. Which is why their work stands out.
God help me, I'll even admit that's what Stephenie Meyer did with Twilight. Her changes to vampires almost ruined them in hindsight, but she owed a lot of her success when it happened to those changes. The changes brought something different to the table. Goodness knows her success cannot be attributed to her writing talent. The woman has almost none.
Anyway;
Since 2001 the amount of Zombie books and films has doubled. It's still going incredibly strong with no letup. I can't help thinking that this trend will continue or morph into something very similar. Plagues, bugs, viruses, strains, more of the same--pandemics. I guess we owe it all to Romero, although it was alive in culture thousands of years before that. I know some of the self-publishers who got on this trope years ago and are still profiting from it. Me? never wrote one. I just can't ascribe a thorough characterization to a foe/protag that either is fast or slow and eats flesh. Oh, and many of them need head-shots, fire or complete dismemberment.
Zombies are so ill-struck, deteriorated, limited in agility and function, it's a wonder they're alive at all. They attack in shear numbers and are usually brought down by gunfire or other instruments of mayhem and destruction. For the life of me I can't see a complex plot in any of these movies. I'm sure some of the books (I haven't read yet) have a semblance of motivation and diversity--but I wonder what, other than wiping the hoard out, surviving or finding a cure, is the statement or solution to this. I mean, how much better could one Z flick be from the next? Do we add sparkles or really smart zombies who can mask their identities? Shape-shifting zombies--really pretty or handsome ones. We've got them on ships/boats, grocery stores, in the forest and in desolate cities and townships. Just keep changing the environments and locations?
I'm agog at running through the TV listings and finding Z movies in the droves. The science and nature channels are running series and special programs. I think the only Z movie that made me laugh and pay attention was Zombieland. That one had some personality.
What say you? Is this Zombie thing a tiresome, worked over trope or trend, or are we headed for more of this for the next couple years? I wish I had a crystal ball--As far as trends go--this one's got me stymied and a little bit fed up.
I had two editors tell me that Michael Crichtonish type strain and plague books were as dead as ever. This was four years ago. I'd like to ask them about that now and see what they're buying.
Chris