SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

Clarkesworld Magazine, Issue 155, August 2019
23 views
Short Fiction Discussions > “In This Moment, We Are Happy“ by Chen Qiufan

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Link: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/chen_...

We'll be reading this novelette throughout February. Post comments and use spoiler tags when necessary.

Chen Qiufan writes great short stories (and maybe novel but I have yet to read Waste Tide) so I have high expectation on this one.


Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Starting today


Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Finished during dinner. Chen Qiufan does not disappoint!

It's not new, but I just enjoyed the way it was framed and narrated.

Love this kind of thought experiment. The end sounds like my kind of utopia.


message 4: by Joelle.P.S (new)

Joelle.P.S | 150 comments Wow, this 1 is really intriguing! I’m gonna jot down some of my thoughts while reading because I’m having SO MANY. I have never before written so much for an online bookclub discussion....

(I’m sure all of you have your own anecdotes of procreation / attempts to conceive / travails of others’ such experiences, so if mine aren’t of interest to you, feel free to skip this “spoiler” section.)

(view spoiler)

My thoughts on the story:
PART ONE investigates some fascinating aspects/ramifications of the bond that naturally develops between surrogate mother & baby.
PART TWO:
“the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) logo” This line made me smile. Good policy!
“you could have skipped the nervous system integrations.” OMG why would anyone NOT skip the nervous system integrations? LOL
““Pregnant” (2911)” typo or A FILM FROM THE FUTURE??? LOL
“At first we thought our biggest obstacle would be the technology. Now we’ve realized that our biggest obstacle is other people” ☹
PART TWO ends powerfully.
PART THREE:
“Its Christianity-based values and culture are worthless in the face of the great reproductive decline.” LOL soz not soz I enjoyed this sentence.
“I’ve been asked to reduce the proclamatory style of my rhetoric by about twenty degrees.” Also a fun sentence. 😊
“Brave New World” Thank you for mentioning my favorite-ever book. 😊
“laughably absurd” and for calling it “laughably absurd.” LOL
“we refuse to contribute to existing discrimination or new racial conflicts.” Wow, good goal: good luck with that.
“Each individual will have the freedom to determine their own sex. Or they may be entirely sexless.” Okay, that’s cool.
“only a third survived under the care of adoptive parents.” OMG
Okay, PART THREE is generally amazing. (I read a lot of post-apocalyptic / dystopia books. This is fascinating.)

Overall, FIVE STARS
obviously very thought-provoking
&
I might want to read everything he’s ever written
(that’s been translated into English...).


message 5: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl (cherylllr) Hm. High on the "What If" factor, for sure.
But I'm not sure I understand what MOW45 is doing. Why won't most babies be born traditionally?


message 6: by Joelle.P.S (new)

Joelle.P.S | 150 comments Good question. Revisiting...
MOW45 does refer to "the great reproductive decline" and gives some examples: "Many parts of the world have relapsed into tribalism, where humans who still have functional reproductive systems are kept in captivity like livestock."
So by this speculative 2038 something has caused MASSIVE infertility around the world. In that case, technological means of reproducing would be imperative to keep humanity from impending extinction.
I'm guessing without that infertility crisis, neohumans would be unnecessary, & no one would invest in the research/technology to create them.
I do appreciate the technological solution. WAY better than the (too many) postapocalypse books wherein [primarily] the women get stuck in breeding farms.


message 7: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl (cherylllr) Huh. I guess I need this to be drawn out to be a longer story. Your explanation is good, but I'm still more confused than I like to be. Also I got stuck on the KO story. What a tear-jerker! And well-done, believable, too.


message 8: by Joelle.P.S (new)

Joelle.P.S | 150 comments I getcha: confusion after finishing a read is (usually) not a comfortable feeling!

Have you read anything else of Chen Qiufan's? Last year I gave 4 stars to his stories "The Fish of Lijiang" & "The Year of the Rat" from Ken Liu's translation/anthology Invisible Planets: Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction in Translation. I'll read Waste Tide for a July IRL bookclub.


message 9: by Silvana (last edited Feb 11, 2020 11:15PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Joelle, I enjoyed reading your thoughts. Almost every passage in the story presents an opportunity to ponder.

I was especially stunned with this: "At first we thought our biggest obstacle would be the technology. Now we’ve realized that our biggest obstacle is other people." It is and always be the case. What deters progress is the people, and their impact to each other.

this part:
“Each individual will have the freedom to determine their own sex. Or they may be entirely sexless.” It is beyond cool.

And this one: "The new humans will no longer bear the responsibility for propagating their own genes. "

Yes, please! The story is rather timely since I just read Theory of Bastards, in which one of the basic premise is that our action women are determined by our desire to reproduce and that affects us when we select men. This is research based but I keep thinking how we could have more agency in choosing whichever way we want, regardless whether we want to reproduce or not. We keep evolving and it is time to free ourselves from our DNA-based urges and whatnots, as we please.

Artificial wombs are indeed not new in SF. Here's an article that discusses the topic, pretty interesting: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/buckl...


Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Joelle wrote: "I getcha: confusion after finishing a read is (usually) not a comfortable feeling!

Have you read anything else of Chen Qiufan's? Last year I gave 4 stars to his stories "The Fish..."


His stories in Broken Stars: Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction in Translation are also good.

I am thinking of getting Waste Tide too when it's on sale again.


message 11: by Silvana (last edited Feb 11, 2020 11:20PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Cheryl wrote: "Huh. I guess I need this to be drawn out to be a longer story. Your explanation is good, but I'm still more confused than I like to be. Also I got stuck on the KO story. What a tear-jerker! And wel..."

IKR?! KO's story gives me all the feels.

MOW45 acknowledged the current situation had been too dire but I wonder whether they also thought about the effect of overpopulation. Surely the loss of fertility might have positive impact since our planet could not longer hold the burden?

It's not that I am totally against reproduction, but at least providing options that expands beyond sex would be much preferable.


message 12: by Gabi (new)

Gabi | 3441 comments Silvana wrote: " Artificial wombs are indeed not new in SF. Here's an article that discusses the topic, pretty interesting: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/buckl...

."


I haven't read the article (just on a fly by to work), but I'm reading the Vorkosigan saga at the moment (first book 1986) and there artificial wombs are the default way in one of the future societies. The mc is constantly wondering why others don't use the same system.

From personal experience (1 successful pregnancy, 1 pregnancy loss and 1 case of emergency caesarian cause of life threatening situation) I can see why societies would meander towards artificial devices, but I wouldn't want to swap my personal experiences and feelings during pregnancy for anything.


Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Gabi wrote: "Silvana wrote: " Artificial wombs are indeed not new in SF. Here's an article that discusses the topic, pretty interesting: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/buckl...

."

I haven't read the article ..."


Was that Cordelia's people that used artificial womb?

Totally understand, Gabi, to each their own ;)


message 14: by Gabi (new)

Gabi | 3441 comments @Silvana: yes, it is Cordelia's people.

@Joelle: just read your impressions and loved them!


Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments Speaking of KO's story in the story, it was mentioned that it was criticized by women's right movement. I wonder why. Isn't it good if men also bear the burden from pregnancy, delivery, then taking care of the babies? If child caring is for both, why pregnancy has to be exclusively for women? If men want to do it, knowing the risks, so be it.


message 16: by Joelle.P.S (new)

Joelle.P.S | 150 comments Silvana wrote: "...why pregnancy has to be exclusively for women? If men want to do it, knowing the risks, so be it."

Yeah when he was all "there are an infinite number of ways that I could have died during this process" I was like: yup, that's pregnancy/childbirth, since forever!


message 17: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl (cherylllr) I believe many women felt that KO was mocking them. Remember, he was a an artist, and this pregnancy was conceived (no pun intended) as a sort of performance piece. It wasn't meant to further the cause of science, or of equity.

And some women, perhaps the more traditionalist, probably felt like he was co-opting what makes Motherhood the special province of Women.


message 18: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl (cherylllr) Btw, I believe that the biosphere, including humankind, would be a lot happier & healthier if there were a lot fewer humans. And I see many young people agreeing with me. I wound up with three sons, and I'm pretty sure I'll never get any grandchildren; they just like their independence too much for that.

With less encouragement from the churches to Go forth and multiply, with increased access to birth control, with more labor saving technology and better health care, with less expectation from family & community,, fewer people are having babies, and those that do are having smaller family. Didn't I read that Japan and Europe are having negative population growth? If all the native oldsters want caregivers they better start welcoming immigrants!

Sorry, not the place for such a divergent discussion. But that's what I mean about the story. I needed more. What about different approaches in other parts of the world?


message 19: by Silvana (last edited Feb 12, 2020 09:13AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 2790 comments That's a good explanation on KO, Cheryl, thanks.

Yep in most of the developed countries nowadays the drive to have kids is really low so they give subsidies for anyone who are willing to have babies like in Japan.

My country won't be following their steps since even with the rising urbanization, cost of living, working moms and increase of marital age since our society sees children as a woman's biggest achievement and worth, after getting a husband. Therefore, any of the tech in this story will not get any traction/support and those who want to have it need to go to other countries.


back to top