Christian Readers discussion

Science and Faith share this in common: They both believe that there is some universal force working in nature to make sure all facts are consistent and coherent. This is necessary to believe in order to even do science. As soon as you ask for evidence you admit that everything must be consistent in order that any evidence means anything. Theists take this force of consistency to be will of an intelligence whose purpose it is to ensure all this coherence. Much more at:

https://www.amazon.com/Thoughts-Scien...

Not trying to be argumentative, but there are tons of godless atheists and Christ-rejectors who are scientists. Those who believe in the theory of evolution are some. Those who do experiments on aborted fetal tissue are another.
I can't imagine who their "some universal force working" would be.

You're right. Atheists tend to take this universal consistency for granted. And they don't think it has anything to do with their beliefs and intentions. They want to think that there is no afterlife and that they will not be held accountable for their deeds.
However, to pose a theory that there is no afterlife is in essences a contradiction of terms. Science is in the business of only posing theories that can be observed. And it is impossible observe no afterlife, for you would not be able to observe anything in that case. The only observable option is that there is an afterlife to observe. And the only thing you can observe there is that you were either right to believe in it, or you were wrong to not believe in it.
These are some of the major topics in my book. It may begin to read like the book is complicated and sophisticated. But there is no need to worry. You will soon realize that most of the things said are rather obvious.
You know how to contact me if you have questions.

Michael says: to pose a theory that there is no afterlife is in essences a contradiction of terms. Science is in the business of only posing theories that can be observed. And it is impossible observe no afterlife, for you would not be able to observe anything in that case. The only observable option is that there is an afterlife to observe.
My reply: What an excellent reply. It sounds like you've had a few heated discussions with atheistic scientists.

Michael wrote: "Science and Faith share this in common: They both believe that there is some universal force working in nature to make sure all facts are consistent and coherent. This is necessary to believe in or..."
Too bad your book is only available in e-format. I only read paperbacks. Let me know if that changes.

I was hoping a few people would read it in e-format so I could have an opportunity to get some feedback before committing to print. I've filtered out as many mistakes as I can find. But I could use some help from others. Thanks.

Michael, I just ordered it and will read it and give my thoughts via review (I’m assuming it’s been added to GR). I’m not the greatest at writing reviews, but maybe it will help.

Thanks. If you have questions, I do have a website from which you can send me a message.

I just amended my book to make it less complicated. You are invited to read and make comments. If you find something that needs more attention, I may have to amend it again. I always appreciate your thoughts and suggestions. Thank you.

https://www.amazon.com/Thoughts-Scien...