Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
1001 Book List
>
How often is the list updated/edited?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Paula
(new)
Nov 24, 2008 04:21PM

reply
|
flag

I would say, that the list was improved simply because they took off Cocaine Nights by Ballard. Also it appears to have become a more international.





I think people in this group have their own way of going about the list/lists. I saw recently someone quite adamant that everyone should stick with whatever list they start with.
Personally, I'm just shooting for 1001 books off any combination of the lists. But it's such a personal challenge that there's no reason why you can't create your own rules!


I see what you did there! ;-)
I expect that I will never complete any version of the lists, mostly because I don't choose to read solely, or even primarily, from the list(s). But I have an abiding fondness for checking things off, so if I am casting about for something to read, the list is a great place to find things. Particularly the classics, which I can download for free on my iPhone and always have a book around. Hence, I am reading "Far from the Madding Crown" - mostly when I am in madding crowds: stuck places I didn't expect to have a delay and therefore in need of a book. And quite enjoying it. I didn't care for Return of the Native, but as so many of Hardy's books are on the list I figured I'd give another one a try, something I wouldn't have done if not for the list! So I see it as a tool more than a goal.

Your points here are well taken, but I suggest just adding one other to your thinking. Boxall uses a large committee of literary critics and authors to come up with his lists. He doesn't do it alone. I suspect new specialists and influences are present in each revision, and, therefore, new authors and/or books are focused on. It's all so subjective anyway, and no one could have read all the books that might be eligible for such a list. That is why I find value in studying all of them and tend to think, at least in some respect, added late or removed later, each book has some merit worth exploring for the sake of studying the development of fictional literature. That said, I think everyone should, as I do, pick and choose their reading material to suit their own goals, purposes for reading and tastes. These lists and others just offer a meritorious number to start from.

You've got a good point, Judith. It's not that I don't like the idea of the list (I'm also one of those who like checking things off) and I've discovered some great books through it I wouldn't have considered otherwise. I also appreciate the effort of making the list more international. It's fun, and I enjoy this group here, so probably no major harm done with the changing lists....

"
Yes, I agree - there are so many on the list and so many NOT on the list(s) that I'm using it more as a guide to find books/authors I might otherwise have missed or disregarded.
I just joined up and found that two lists were confusing (how could it change? I get it now - thanks!) and now there's going to be a third...that sealed the deal. I decided to use the second list (because that's the one I started with) and I'll peruse the other two for the changes. :)

Very well said! I agree with your approach 100%.

I agree.

