Fans of Interracial Romance discussion
Archived Threads
>
LOGO Will Dump All Gay Programming
date
newest »



I mean television is already 80% reality shows! It is getting like searching for a needle in a haystack to find something that's not a reality show these days.
People don't wanna watch good programming anymore and only want quick fixes like reality shows. I guess they outnumber those of us who would like some quality entertainment.
This is why other than sports, and ID Discovery, I don't watch hardly anything on television anymore.
Television has officially gone to the dogs.
message 5:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)

Where am I supposed to go for my Noah's Arc fix?
And yes as much as I hate to admit it, I love RuPaul's Drag Race. Some of those guys make me want to body-slam them for being better looking and able to step in seven-inch heels better than me, LOL!

I also love her guest judge panels. I just about fell out when I saw John Salley and Rick Fox. They were both wonderful, inciteful judges and and made some great points. John Salley has always been a bit of natural comedian.

Someone said the same thing about Noah's Arc. They said, "Man guess I'll have to get Noah's Arc on DVD."
I don't understand this whatsoever, it's stupid. How can you change a channel completely? And what makes them think that what they start showing will be any better?
Yeah they'd be a fool to get rid of RuPaul. I think Ru's the biggest show they ever had. And yes those men look good don't they? I am not too impressed with the queens from this season though. Only two of them look good. The rest look to' up from the flo' up. I keep wondering where did they get THESE queens? Were these the guys that didn't make the cut the other seasons? ROFL!
Only a few are fierce. At least they had three big ladies this season. One of them was voted off this week. But I love it when the big girls get represented seeing how I am one. I hope a big girl wins one day.
But overall these queens of this season don't cut it for me. None of them are drop dead gorgeous like in the other competitions. One was so pitiful Michelle Visage got on her for not putting lotion on her legs! She claimed she bronzed them, please. ROFL! Them thangs were so ashy you could tell it through the screen! How dare a queen disrespect Ru coming up there with ashy legs? *shaking head*
message 8:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)

OMG, ashy legs? Really? Ooh, smackdown time!

Dumbest decision EVER! What the hell do they plan on showing now? Soon there wont be a LOGO network at all, I bet.

Is this what viewers really want or is it that networks are so cheap they all wanna move to this format? This is getting ridiculous with reality shows!

Most people cite RuPaul as the only thing really anchoring them to the channel. Some have come right out and de-cried the channel with it's reliance on shrill reality shows and re-runs of Buffy etc. as not really telling their stories or stories of the gay community.
So it just sounds like it is just making the official announcement of a shift it has been making over the last few years anyway. At any rate, it sounds as if they've already lost a lot of their gay viewership and support.
message 13:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)


You see how dramas and comedies are cancelled at the drop of a hat these days. They can't compete because so many people wanna watch this trash.


Why folks think reality TV is a guaranteed way of success I don't understand. Most reality shows don't last past three seasons because people get tired of them. They are short-lived shows yet networks are cheap so they will keep throwing them on because they don't cost much of anything to produce.

I mean LOGO has been on long enough to where they could afford to create some good shows. They can't say they had to switch from focusing on gays. They just weren't creative enough to wanna come up with something good.
If I'd had that network, it would've been good. LOL!

Thats true Logo have been on the air too long, to not have there stuff together.Wow, how could a station created for gay and lesbian cancel all there gay programming. I think if it wasnt for Rupaul Drag Race they wouldnt have half there viewer, because thats the only reason I watch. Plus, they should've made a lot of money from that show.
message 19:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)

That's why you're not in charge of LOGO, LOL. What you're talking about makes sense and well, that isn't what most network television is about these days. It's more about dollars, and reality shows are cheap to make. Not to mention most people are utterly shameless and have no problems behaving badly for money and their fifteen minutes of fame.

message 21:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)
Wow. This makes no sense to me. I mean you start out as a gay friendly channel and now you are dumping all of the gay friendly programming?
On another note Soapnet goes off for good this month. Disney is turning it into a 24/7 Disney channel for kids.
I am shocked about Logo! RuPaul's Drag Race is one of my favorite shows! You can read about it here:
http://unicornbooty.com/blog/2012/03/...
Best Wishes!
http://www.stacy-deanne.net