Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy discussion

This topic is about
Theft of Swords
Book Discussions
>
Theft of Swords by Michael J Sullivan
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Michael
(new)
-
added it
May 01, 2012 08:04PM

reply
|
flag


Michael, how is Riyria meant to be pronounced?

As in "the bread"....the thing you listen with.... and "ah that feels good"
Thanks for asking and I'm glad you like the first chapter ;-)

I am a little frustrated with how linear it is so far. Maybe I'm spoiled by Game of Thrones and having like 20 story lines going on at once, but when the main characters have put out one fire and nothing else is burning yet, I get a little bored. I hope we get multiple story lines going soon.
@Jenny - The first chapter and the beginning of the second was probably my favorite part so far. I love the evil... Earl? Can't remember. But anyway, I love how unabashedly evil he is.



@Ritesh - by "second" do you mean "Avempartha" or "Rise of Empire"?



Yes I knew you had done a week of blogging- just couldn't remember if part of all that was a review of Theft or whether you were still reading it at the time.
Sorry, lots of pepople and difficult to keep track of them all.

I get a lot of mail from parents who are reading the books along with their kids which is pretty exciting.



Seriously though I wrote all the books together and so I "strung" out some of the background across the series as opposed to putting it all in the first book.
Myron does come back - but don't look for him in book 2 - I saved him for the lasst volume so he's in Heir of Novron (books 5 and 6).
I'm glad you liked the book.




I do have one callout that was a minor distraction for me, and it's possible I just missed something since I was reading late, but when Royce and Hadrian sneaked into the Castle, shouldn't they have been dripping wet from swimming the moat? I recall that the water temperature was mentioned as well as the dubious nature of the water. Did they strip down and carry their clothing and equipment in a watertight bag or something to that affect? I didn't dwell on that enough to scan back, but wanted to call it out nonetheless. cheers






I have noticed that so far. I really quite like the way you've made it as you said like a series. I was not quite sure at the start of the book how it would continue but I'm starting to see the politics and so forth. I'm now quite curious about Royce and Hadrian's pasts.

I'm hoping to finish this weekend and I'll definitely be continuing the series at some point.

(view spoiler)
Seriously Michael, I know I'm geeking out but I loved Theft of Swords. You're a great writer and you along with this book deserve a lot of success. I'll definitely spread the word about it. I had promised myself that I wouldn't buy any more books until I finish more of my own, but I may have to break that for the next in the series.

As for constructive criticism, there are two points that caught my attention since my last post. First is just my opinion and is a fairly minor point, but you might find some merit in it. As the companions were trying to figure out how to get into the secret prison, it seemed a touch contrived when the conversation was turned to the history of the gods. In the end, I did appreciate how this history was delivered in dialog rather than rhetoric; and I did find it interesting though as yet not critical to the story. Overall, it wasn't enough of a distraction to warrant a revision, but I was a bit concerned at the onset of the conversation.
My second point does call for a revision (IMHO) as it is a rather obvious incongruity. When Myron got all excited about seeing a brown horse and then followed that with questions about what other colors horses came in, I was totally knocked out of the moment. So much so, that I had to go back and recheck earlier pages to confirm the contradiction alarms that were sounding in my mind. Sure enough, Myron says he has seen horses before when visitors came, but he had never touched one. Additionally, it was mentioned that the 20 knights that made him watch as they burned the abbey with his brothers inside departed with their horses the next morning. 20 horses plus all those of the visitors that he had seen, and not one was brown? Further still, he has read every book in the abbey and specifically says he read about horses in those books. I have to assume there was enough about horses that he'd know they did not come in blue or green... I believe the writer intended to create a moment of excitement or tension to keep the reader on edge. Myron's excitment at seeing more horses can accomplish that without going into the whole thing about the various colors. It was cute but out of character (Myron is actually a wealth of knowledge from extensive reading, even if he has no practical application of that knowledge); and it really made me wonder if more such character breaks were forthcoming. An occasional slip such as this is bearable, but too many would be off-putting to many readers, including myself. I'm a third through the first book with only this one major character break, so I'm confident this won't be a problem. Fortunately, it's a very simple fix, and one that can be applied in short order to the electronic versions.
More to come.




Glad to see the book is getting you to stay up later you want to - always a good sign.

message 38:
by
Jonathan , Reader of the fantastic
(last edited Jun 05, 2012 09:47PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

My review: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...



Yeah, a few people have mentioned that, but then others have said that they really like that aspect - so it's always a matter of trying to strik a balance.
My litmus test is always going to be what people think once they finish the whole series, as I sometimes am doing things that may not make sense at the time, but as pieces fit into place new revelations spring to view.


You can vote for it here.

Overall I felt it was a fun read that looks back with a small amount of nostalgia about Tolkein and Lieber et al. We have a world with dwarves, elves, magic etc., we have quest fantasy but it is presented in a contemporary way (women are allowed to have personalities and not just plot points, etc.
There has been some criticism of Sullivan, for instance in a very critical review in Strange Horizons suggesting he is a self publishing star whose books are an amateur mess. This is not at all how I felt of the book. It did feel a little like a first novel (the short story I read of his published this year felt much better written), the plot was not massively original but then it did not aspire to be and knew that that is not always what the readers want. Indeed, this work just like Ready Player One plays to and satisfies readers in a nostalgia for classic tolkeinesque quest fantasy. In the context of the first volume alone I did feel that the dwarf/ elf elements were unnecessary in the sense that they could have been dealt with in different ways (different human races, different cultural classes/ castes) that might have been more interesting but for tapping into the nostalgia vein.
Overall I felt it was a satisfying, light read. I was glad I read it and I may well go on to reading the second book in this volume but have to concede that there are other books on my too read list that are exciting me more at the moment.
Ben wrote: "Overall I felt it was a fun read that looks back with a small amount of nostalgia about Tolkein and Lieber et al...."
Author Michael J. Sullivan has frequently remarked that he has not read Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd & Gray Mouser stories. I'm sure he's frequently asked about the comparison: a thief and a warrior in a sword and sorcery tale, though they don't have much else in common. (I think at first this was just a lacuna in his reading, but I suspect now he avoids picking up a Leiber book because he enjoys telling people he hasn't read them :)
Author Michael J. Sullivan has frequently remarked that he has not read Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd & Gray Mouser stories. I'm sure he's frequently asked about the comparison: a thief and a warrior in a sword and sorcery tale, though they don't have much else in common. (I think at first this was just a lacuna in his reading, but I suspect now he avoids picking up a Leiber book because he enjoys telling people he hasn't read them :)
Ben wrote: "I did feel that the dwarf/ elf elements were unnecessary in the sense that they could have been dealt with in different ways (different human races, different cultural classes/ castes) ...."The later volumes will expand a bit on Avryn & Erivan's's elves, at least. Though you are likely correct that in any fantasy sword and sorcery, elves could easily be replaced by another distinct human culture (though some details such as the "classic" racial traits of better eyesight/hearing and longer lifespan do appear in the later Riyria books.)

There are similar challenges that could be levied against Douglas Adams seeming to lift substantial amounts of stuff from some Robert Sheckley stories. He loved Sheckley but if memory serves he claimed he had not read one of the stories from which there was the strongest connection. How much is coincidence, how much subconscious and how much is through other authors who have also used the same base source (Sword of Shannara rather than LoTR etc).
In any case it was a fun read.

You are correct, and I have! It's actually how I learned about Lieber's books...when reading a review on one mine that indicated there were similarities. I do want to read them someday, but I won't until after I'm 100% sure I'll not be writing any more Royce an Hadrian. So if you see a Lieber work show up on my "Read" shelf - that's an indication that there won't be any more Riyria.
Books mentioned in this topic
Greener Grass (other topics)Authors mentioned in this topic
Michael J. Sullivan (other topics)Fritz Leiber (other topics)