Freedom v Fear

I don't make statements like this a lot, and I don't really feel like engaging in a huge debate. But there's something I need to say regarding Charlie Hebdo.

God knows I have little in common with the folks who died. I doubt we'd have agreed on very much. Looking over some of their work, I find myself rolling my eyes a lot.

But I do agree on at least one matter with them--they should be free to speak their minds without fear.

I saw this tweet attached to one of the cartoons responding to the massacre:

"Still mortified about our fallen cartoonist colleagues, but free speech will always win."

No.

No it won't.

The history of the human race demonstrates /very/ convincingly that free speech is the /exception/ to the human condition, not the rule. For millennia, those who spoke out were imprisoned or killed. Hell, you could say something that wasn't even subversive, just inept and stupid, and be destroyed for committing the crime of lese majeste.

Make no mistake. What we have today is a level of freedom and self-determination on a scale unparalleled in the history of our species. We live in what is, in many ways, a golden age. So much so that we give tremendous credit to the adage, "The pen is mightier than the sword."

But everyone always forgets the first half of that quote:

"Under the rule of men entirely great, the pen is mightier than the sword."

I'm not sure I know of anyplace that's ruled by anyone "entirely great." That adage wasn't a statement of philosophy, as it was originally used: it was a statement of irony.

Don't believe me? Look around. Notice that everywhere you go in the world, whoever happens to be ruling seems to have a great many swords.

Still, the idea contained within the quote is a powerful one--that intangible ideas, thoughts, and beliefs can have tremendous power. And that's why we should be paying close attention.

After all, intangible fear can be mightier than the sword, too. Hell, it has been for quite a while now. Don't believe me? Try getting on an airplane without taking your shoes off in the security line. While you're doing that, try cracking a joke about having a knife.

That's the power of fear, guys.

We. Are. In. Danger.

The threat isn't aimed at our government or our borders or our resources. It's targeting something far more precious--our identity. It's changing us, who we are, how we live, and not for the better.

The Western world has got the biggest and sharpest sword the planet has ever known, yes. But the extremists are armed with a weapon just as powerful: Fear. And these nuts are really good at using it.

There is /one/ way that freedom, freedom to speak, to choose, to grow, to believe, to improve, survives in the face of violent attack.

Free men and women defend it, violently if necessary--or it dies.

It's that simple. It really is.

If we forget that, if we forget that there are predators in the world who very much want to destroy those freedoms in the name of their god, their philosophy, their politics, if we forget that our freedoms /can/ and /will/ be taken away if we sit staring and do nothing, they are as good as gone.

Freedom doesn't defend itself.

We have to do it.
493 likes ·   •  56 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 07, 2015 20:14
Comments Showing 1-50 of 56 (56 new)    post a comment »

message 1: by Daydreamtime (new)

Daydreamtime Truth.


message 2: by Charlie (new)

Charlie Daydreamtime wrote: "Truth."

+1


message 3: by Karen (new)

Karen We live in scary times when people can be shot in their home country for using free speech.


message 4: by Калоян (new)

Калоян "Freedom doesn't defend itself.
We have to do it."
— words to live by


message 5: by Frank (new)

Frank Well put.


message 6: by Tnkw01 (last edited Jan 08, 2015 10:52AM) (new)

Tnkw01 and let me add...Please remember those who have died trying to defend it and never, ever forget what they had to do so we can have freedom. Thank you Jim, I love your books and I can see that you as a person are a man of great integrity.


message 7: by Nicholas (new)

Nicholas You are quite correct in pointing out that our level of free speech is the exception, not the rule, historically speaking. But you are making the mistake of talking about defense of freedom in the face of violent attack. Extremists, terrorists, and those who use violence are not the biggest threats to our freedoms. No, the most significant threats to our freedoms comes at the hands of those who use the pen.

"Under the rule of men entirely great, the pen is mightier than the sword."

Great doesn't necessarily mean good. The people in charge wield great power, without the wisdom or moral compass that guides it in a good way. They don't change things or create things like the USA PATRIOT Act out of fear. They create things like that using fear as an excuse, but it's about power. They have it, they want more. And we, as a people, don't actually want freedom. We want the illusion of freedom. So the majority of us takes what the government gives us. We grouse about it, and then say "See, we still have our freedoms" because they consider minor complaining to be a major expression of free speech.

Our level of free speech is the exception, but the rule will eventually reassert itself, because that's what we truly want. Freedom means choice, and as a people, we don't want either one.


message 8: by MomToKippy (new)

MomToKippy Nail on the head Nicholas!!!!!


message 9: by Karen (new)

Karen Yes, I agree with you too Nicholas!


message 10: by Steven (new)

Steven Testify!


message 11: by Maryanne (new)

Maryanne Sakai-james Very well said, Mr. Butcher.


message 12: by Neal (new)

Neal Nicholas wrote: "You are quite correct in pointing out that our level of free speech is the exception, not the rule, historically speaking. But you are making the mistake of talking about defense of freedom in the ..."

As much as I wish I could disagree, this is the sad fact of humanity as a whole. We are disposed to follow the masses, and I don't think that's something that's going to stop... ever.

Here's to hoping the day humanity as a whole starts making the right choices, and getting along is just over the horizon.


message 13: by Ruth (new)

Ruth Fabiano Well said Mr. Butcher, totally agree!


message 14: by Derek Peter (new)

Derek Peter Hawley "there are predators in the world who very much want to destroy those freedoms in the name of their god"

One word: Nemesis.


message 15: by Warren (new)

Warren I can state undoubtedly that what was done in Paris is wrong. What I can't figure out is what can be done about it. This isn't WWII where you go to war and end the regime, ending the threat (threat=fear). You could economically do battle, assuming the primary problem is contained in the middle east and we could FINALLY get our need for oil under control, but we already know that this battle has gone beyond borders. Nicholas already stated above the fears that come from "enemies domestic" who seek to grasp power through legal means in reaction to such physical violence.

I'd love to not only see the problem but have a way to reach toward a solution. No clue how to do that...


message 16: by Cindra (new)

Cindra Just paraphrased this to someone in my household. They looked at me and said:

Freedom isn't free....you just have to possess the b*lls to mint the coin....

Harsh, but accurate.


message 17: by Aeonflux (new)

Aeonflux D'avranches True but not all true "free speech will always win" is a rally cry and also there's always people to go against power and fear.Those dead brought laughter against bigotry. You haven't to agree with them on everything but we can agree on freedom of speech and drawing (therefore). They were children of 1969 not hungered by power. Sometimes they were crude but to be ear and to showthey were unstoppable they had to. And next wenesday CharlieHebdo will be published.


message 18: by Cornelia (new)

Cornelia "Free men and women defend it, violently if necessary--or it dies."

Defending it - for sure.
Violently - never.

Je suis Charlie, et je n'ai pas peur.


message 19: by Ladyhawk (new)

Ladyhawk Was our defense of our freedom in the face of a mighty oppressor during WWII not violent? Like it or not, war is violent. And unfortunately, sometimes the only response to an unreasonable, unyielding enemy.


message 20: by Tom (last edited Jan 11, 2015 09:24AM) (new)

Tom Mathews In defense of Bulwer-Lytton's 'pen is mightier than the sword' statement, no sword can kill an idea. At best, it can suppress it for a while.

Every successful revolution was won not on the strength of the swords it began with, but with the ideas that inspired people to risk everything for a cause. Thomas Paine's pen inspired American colonists to stand up to the British. Voltaire's writing inspired the French to bring an end to its monarchy. At the height of WWI, Germany sent a train bearing Vladimir Lenin, the greatest weapon it had, to Russia in hopes of knocking the Tzar out of the war. It worked.

Even the scum-sucking killers in Paris were motivated not by a gun at their backs but by the twisted words whispered into their ears by the true terrorists.

I am not saying that words alone will always win out. Churchill and last week's events reminded us that "We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." Even so, be they good or evil, it is ideas, not swords, that inspire great actions.


message 21: by Jeanne (new)

Jeanne Griffith Well said, Jim, Well said.


message 22: by Tonya (new)

Tonya Hodgson Excellent points!


message 23: by Victoria (new)

Victoria Elliott To quote Dresden "...predators, human and otherwise, sense fear and look for weakness..." (Proven Guilty). Letting terrorist silence us because we are afraid will only allow them to win. We must find a way to overcome or use that fear, because "fear properly handled, could turn into something useful" (Proven Guilty). It can give us the drive to push forward and help one another in the face of adversity.


message 24: by Debbie (new)

Debbie Napier Small men will always fear free speech. As each dictator or despot will always fear the leader yet to come from the people they oppress.


message 25: by David (new)

David Gosnell Huzzah!


message 26: by Meilin (new)

Meilin Agreed!


message 27: by Michael (new)

Michael Manning Very well said.


message 28: by Christopher (new)

Christopher Word!


message 29: by Jarod (new)

Jarod Morgan Thanks for that, Jim.


message 30: by Carlos (new)

Carlos Rodriquez Nicholas wrote: "You are quite correct in pointing out that our level of free speech is the exception, not the rule, historically speaking. But you are making the mistake of talking about defense of freedom in the ..."

Nicholas - Brilliant and beautifully stated.


message 31: by Gav (new)

Gav I think the quote we're all looking for is...

"Polka will never die."


message 32: by Karen (new)

Karen Gav wrote: "I think the quote we're all looking for is...

"Polka will never die.""

Love it!


message 33: by Markie (last edited Jan 29, 2015 11:51PM) (new)

Markie Rees Karen wrote: "Gav wrote: "I think the quote we're all looking for is...

"Polka will never die.""
Love it!"



I love that it spells out pwned XD

Anyway very well written JB and well said! Though I would certainly hope that violence can be avoided whenever possible, if possible.


message 34: by Amyiw (new)

Amyiw "in the name of their god, their philosophy, their politics"... , in the end it is greed, greed for money and power (in name ONLY as they don't follow the sayings of any, religion, or politics...)


message 35: by Ann (new)

Ann Well said, Jim. Thank you.


message 36: by Tria (new)

Tria I wish I could believe it. My country seems to be going the wrong direction on that at present - our government feed the majority of the mainstream media propaganda and deliberately ill-framed statistics, and the media churn out content full of vitriol and simple hatred towards the poor, the sick, the disabled and anyone "not like us", and the general public swallow it because "it was in the paper, it has to be true". I believed that as a small child. I know better now. I wish that were not the exception to the rule among the British population. Question everything, take nothing for granted. And remember Pastor Niemöller's words, because they are as relevant today as when they were first chosen.


message 37: by Tom (new)

Tom Mathews Tria wrote: "the media churn out content full of vitriol and simple hatred towards the poor, the sick, the disabled and anyone "not like us", and the general public swallow it because "it was in the paper, it has to be true". I believed that as a small child. I know better now."

Mark Twain once said
"If you don't read a newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read a newspaper you are misinformed."

I guess that holds true on your side of the pond as well.


message 38: by Carlos (new)

Carlos Rodriquez Bravo!


message 39: by Ann (new)

Ann Good Twain quote, Tom.


message 40: by Jason (new)

Jason A Well Said and something we should remember


message 41: by EDM (new)

EDM Damn, can I use this on Mega Man MUSH.


message 42: by Walter (new)

Walter Lauzon Straight on target, GJ.


message 43: by O. (new)

O. Thank you, as always.
And: defense of freedom of speech must begin in our own hearts and minds.


message 44: by Eric (new)

Eric Mesa Old blog post, but thanks for letting me see the beginning of that quote. People often take quotes out of context and I think the pen/sword quote REALLY needs to be in context.

Shoot, just look at the difference between US and UK. There are things you can say in the US about celebs (for example) that would get you sued in UK


message 45: by Migo (new)

Migo Nicholas wrote: "You are quite correct in pointing out that our level of free speech is the exception, not the rule, historically speaking. But you are making the mistake of talking about defense of freedom in the ..."

Power is the root of those who rule, wether gained by word or sword, their rule, and rules will mitigate the risks of 'free speech'.


message 46: by Michael (new)

Michael Cornelia wrote: ""Free men and women defend it, violently if necessary--or it dies."

Defending it - for sure.
Violently - never.

Je suis Charlie, et je n'ai pas peur."


Never? If we hadn’t resisted with violence in each World War, you’d be speaking a different language now and growing up in a fascist/imperialist police state. It’s arrogant, naive, and ignorant to believe change and resistance can be achieved solely through non-violent methods.


message 47: by Phylisha (new)

Phylisha Stone What you said.


message 48: by Douglas (new)

Douglas Laurion Truth! We are free, if we think we are!


message 49: by Maho01 (new)

Maho01 The sad thing is, this is more true than ever. We now have people on both sides of politics cheering for censorship; that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequence.

It boggles my mind and thoroughly disheartens me to see such lack of thought lifted up as some kind of virtue and not the tragedy it is.


message 50: by Andrew (new)

Andrew Brooks True. But before you can get the younger generations to defend it, you have to teach them something that has been left out of their upbringings. That is you never know what might happen; so you can't make decisions based on FEAR of what Might Happen if this if that. You decide rationally what should happen and find out


« previous 1
back to top