Must be a group member before inviting friends
Underground Knowledge — A discussion group discussion
MISCELLANEOUS TOPICS
>
The 5G network: Are safety concerns valid? And how will 5G change things? And what about 6G and 7G in future?
date
newest »
newest »
Environment is one thing but I will take a lot of convincing that electricity hasn't been good for our health. Think of all the life saving equipment in hospitals that are powered by electricity.
Dr. Katherine Horton:Defeating 5G as a mass DEW Terraforming platform for AI Artificial Intelligence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvQ3E...
There is highly credible research and evidence that shows that 5G correlates with COVID-19.
Health workers call for caution over 5G roll-out https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-new... Some 400 doctors and 900 health care workers have signed an open letter to the government, urging them to exercise caution regarding the roll-out by Proximus of a forerunner of the next generation of mobile data, known as 5G.
ARCHITECTING THE BEAST SYSTEM: AI Control of Food Supply https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLMpJ...Forces are working to take total control of every drop of oil extracted from the ground, every fish caught from the sea, and every last bean harvested. It requires an immense technical infrastructure comprising 5G, blockchain, and Artificial Intelligence. This infrastructure has been built and is now being deployed, and we must understand that it is -- in the very words of the Department of Defense -- an AI weapons system. And that system is going live NOW.
6G WILL BRING ‘DIGITAL TWINS’, SAMSUNG SAYS – AND IT’S TWO YEARS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE https://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...'It will be possible to replicate people, devices, objects, systems, and even places in a virtual world,' a research paper states
Health & Environmental Impacts of 5G Can’t be Overlooked for High-Speed and Smoother Accessibility https://www.thenewleam.com/2020/07/he...The coming in of 5G technologies has generated both excitement and worry, as concerns regarding its impact on people’s health and environment raise pertinent questions.
THERE ARE CONCERNS THAT 5G CAN PUT PEOPLE AT A GREATER RISK OF CANCER, LEAD TO HYPERSENSITIVITY, IT HAS POTENTIAL TO AFFECT LOCAL BIODIVERSITY AND KILL BIRDS AND PLANTS.
Yes, we cannot deny the fact that given the centrality of mobile phones and wireless electronic devices in our lives, the coming in of 5G will make life quite smooth and easy for us but it is in this context that it becomes extremely important for us to also look into the environmental and health impacts of 5G.
These concerns are born because 5G technologies will make use of higher energy millimetre wave radiations and these are widely known to pose health hazards for humanity. So while we do talk about how exciting the prospects of 5G are and how easy internet access will potentially become for us, what we cannot negate is the fact that it is certain to bring about adverse impacts for the human body and the environment. People throughout the world have been expressing worries about the potential dangers of technologies and especially of radiation emitted from mobile phones for decades and it is not as if the advent of 5G has started a discussion that didn’t exist before.
But what also cannot be overlooked is the fact that the introduction of 5G has raised the concerns to an altogether new level and has people across the world worried and deeply anxious. These concerns may have grown because 5G requires a higher number of cells compared to 4G or earlier generations and that is why there is a larger number of 5G masts/towers than what people were accustomed to seeing in earlier versions and secondly because 5G uses higher frequency (24-52.6GHz, compared to a maximum of 5.9 GHz used by 4G).
The first time that the fear of wireless technologies at high frequencies impacting the human body was raised was by Bill Curry in 2000. He showed through his research that higher absorption of radiation was possible at higher frequencies but his research was dismissed by subsequent findings and it was asserted that due to the shielding effect present in human skin, higher frequencies meant lower absorption and lower frequencies led to greater absorption.
When 4G was released in 2012, there was again a resurgence of the debate on whether higher frequencies put us more at risk or whether lower frequencies are better than higher ones etc. The usage of 5G requires a great concentration of mobile towers and masts and thereby the worries of the ardent critics of 4G are likely to be further angered and worried. There are concerns that 5G can put people at a greater risk of cancer, lead to hypersensitivity, it has potential to affect local biodiversity and kill birds and plants.While many scientific studies in recent years have dismissed claims that allege that mobile phone usage can cause cancer, many environmentalists and health practitioners continue to place their worries before us and compel us to listen to their concerns with attention and seek possible solutions.
5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668... "In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells."
"The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells."
Doctors: M. Fioranelli , A. Sepehri, M.G. Roccia, M. Jafferany, O. Yu. Olisova, K.M. Lomonosov, T. Lotti1,3
Department of Nuclear, Sub-nuclear and Radiation Physics, G. Marconi University, Rome, Italy;
Central Michigan Saginaw, Michigan , USA;
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, I.M.
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668...
https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/20...
FULL PDF SUMMARY OF STUDY: https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/wp...
https://web.archive.org/web/202007220... This medical paper linking 5G directly to the virus has now been removed from PubMed due to complaints - was this a case of pseudo-science accidentally getting into a well respected medical publication? Or was it censorship because the research the team of scientists did is against the prevailing scientific narrative??
There is so much radiation from the sun and other sources that flood the solar system. But adding more at close distances may not be best, but the quick communication is probably worth it.
Study: 5G exposure a “significant factor” in higher covid cases, deaths https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-1...
I know frome my own experience and that of others that concerns about 5G and the microwave emitting things that have come before it, that these concerns are valid. Trees have been chopped down because of course the companies, as well as government organizations that are endorsing such things, don't want the signal to be absorbed and so blocked by the wood of the beautiful trees. I find it a huge relief when I put down the technology and get out to areas where there is little mobile phone signal and wireless technology or microwaves, due to there being fewer houses and people. I find I can think clearer, sleep better and the mood is so much lighter.
Electricity has shaped the modern world. But how has it affected our health and environment?
Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is 'safe' for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before--from an environmental point of view--by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet.
In The Invisible Rainbow, Firstenberg traces the history of electricity from the early eighteenth century to the present, making a compelling case that many environmental problems, as well as the major diseases of industrialized civilization--heart disease, diabetes, and cancer--are related to electrical pollution.